Human Rights Watch urges Japan’s new government under Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi to strengthen its human rights foreign policy.
Policy & Governance

Japan’s New Government Urged to Prioritize Human Rights in Foreign Policy

Japan’s newly formed government, led by Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, is facing growing pressure from global human rights organizations. According to Human Rights Watch (HRW), Japan must strengthen its foreign policy by placing human rights protection at the center of its international strategy. The call comes at a time when regional tensions are rising and Japan’s diplomatic influence is under closer scrutiny.

Why Human Rights Should Be Central to Japan’s Foreign Policy

HRW noted that Japan remains the only G7 nation without targeted sanctions against foreign officials involved in severe human rights abuses. Most G7 countries—including the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada—already use Magnitsky-style sanctions to respond to violations such as torture, mass surveillance, forced disappearances, and political repression.

Introducing similar legislation in Japan, HRW argues, would give Tokyo a stronger and more effective toolkit for responding to abuses in Asia and around the world.

The Need for Stronger Laws and Corporate Accountability

Rights groups also stressed the importance of binding human rights and environmental due diligence laws for Japanese companies operating globally. Such laws would:

  • Prevent forced labor in supply chains
  • Reduce workplace harassment
  • Ensure companies avoid causing environmental damage
  • Support ethical and transparent global trade

Additionally, experts are urging Japan to introduce import restrictions on goods linked to human rights violations, similar to measures already used by other democratic nations.

Takaichi’s Taiwan Remarks and Growing Regional Tensions

Expectations of a firmer human rights stance come amid rising geopolitical tensions. Recently, Prime Minister Takaichi’s comments suggested that a Chinese military attack on Taiwan—if it directly threatened Japan’s security—could lead to a Japanese military response.

These remarks triggered an unusually sharp reaction from Beijing, including:

  • A public travel warning advising Chinese citizens to avoid Japan
  • A formal diplomatic protest
  • A renewed debate over regional security

Although Japanese officials clarified that Japan’s security policy has not fundamentally changed, the episode highlighted the fragile balance of relations in East Asia.

Japan’s Proximity to Ongoing Territorial and Security Disputes

Japan’s close geographic proximity to Taiwan continues to be a major strategic concern. Moreover, Chinese maritime patrols near the Senkaku (Japan) / Diaoyu (China) islands have intensified in recent months.

This situation brings renewed attention to Japan’s regional security posture and underscores why human rights, diplomacy, and defense policy are increasingly interconnected.

Human Rights Challenges in North Korea, Myanmar, and Cambodia

Japan’s foreign policy is also being shaped by worsening human rights conditions in several parts of Asia:

1. North Korea

Long-established repression—including political prison camps, forced labor, and restricted freedoms—continues unabated.

2. Myanmar

The military junta has intensified crackdowns ahead of its proposed elections, leading to widespread concerns about ethnic violence and political persecution.

3. Cambodia

Civic space has narrowed dramatically, with increased pressure on opposition groups, journalists, and civil society organizations.

As the only Asian member of the G7, Japan is being urged to take a more active leadership role by advocating for democracy and human rights across the region.

Japan’s Migration Policies Under Scrutiny

Japan’s immigration reforms are also attracting criticism. Amendments passed earlier this year now allow the government to deport individuals after three rejected asylum applications, which critics warn could put vulnerable people at risk of refoulement—a violation of international refugee protection norms.

Legal experts have raised concerns about:

  • Harsh detention conditions
  • Lack of transparency in asylum procedures
  • Japan’s extremely low refugee acceptance rate

These issues, rights groups argue, undermine Japan’s credibility as a global advocate for human rights.

Call for Stronger Commitment to International Justice

HRW is also urging Japan to expand its engagement with global human rights institutions. Key recommendations include:

  • Joining the UN Genocide Convention
  • Defending the independence of the International Criminal Court (ICC)
  • Increasing funding for humanitarian and development programs affected by global financial shortfalls

These steps, they argue, would reaffirm Japan’s role as a responsible democratic power committed to international law and justice.

Conclusion: A Critical Moment for Japan’s Global Leadership

Japan’s new government faces a pivotal moment. With rising regional tensions, deteriorating rights conditions in neighboring countries, and global calls for stronger leadership, Japan’s approach to human rights will shape both its foreign policy identity and its international reputation.

By adopting robust human rights frameworks, enhancing corporate transparency, and aligning with global justice standards, Japan has the opportunity to emerge as a stronger, more principled voice in Asia and beyond.